The ex-lover of Hwang Ui-jo (Norwich City) has issued a statement criticizing Hwang Ui-jo for denying the allegations of illegal filming in connection with the leak of his private life.

Lee Eun-soo, a lawyer representing Hwang's ex-lover, issued a statement on the 21st, saying, "Hwang expressed that he did nothing illegal and that his cell phone was stolen and that he was threatened with the dissemination of the photos afterward.

"She never consented to Hwang's filming, and if she knew about it, she expressed her displeasure and demanded that it be deleted immediately after it was filmed," he said, adding, "In some cases, she did not even know that it was filmed until she was being investigated."

"At the end of June, Hwang Ui-jo contacted the victim, and a short time later, he asked the victim to sue the distributor in order to catch the distributor as soon as possible," said Eun's lawyer. "It was embarrassing for the victim, but after deep consideration, she filed a formal complaint with the police about the distributor's illegal distribution and Hwang Ui-jo's illegal filming."

She also criticized Hwang's attitude. "Hwang Ui-jo's position was that the video was taken consensually between lovers at the time and that he was not responsible for its dissemination," said Eun's lawyer. "However, it is true that the victim had briefly dated Hwang Ui-jo in the past, but she had never agreed to the filming of other sensitive videos at that time or since, and had repeatedly requested that they be deleted," he said.

"In the first place, if Hwang Ui-jo had not illegally filmed the video as the victim wanted, and if he had deleted the video before it was distributed, the victim would not have been hurt by the illegal filming and his personality would not have been assaulted twice or thrice." "Nevertheless, instead of looking back and reflecting on his mistakes, Hwang Ui-jo lied to the media and said that the video was filmed consensually with his ex-lover, leaving irreparable wounds and trauma in the victim's heart," the statement said.

"The victim was a crime victim who was affected by the illegal filming and never agreed to the illegal filming, so we came to the conclusion that Hwang Ui-jo's criminal behavior cannot be condoned." "We hope that Hwang Ui-jo will regret his mistakes and admit the facts even now, and that can only be a belated apology to the victim."

Hwang is the latest person of interest to be investigated in connection with the recent leak of his personal life. A woman, A, who allegedly threatened him after posting about his personal life, was also detained on June 16.

In June, Ms. A claimed to be Hwang's ex-lover and claimed that he had been in a relationship with multiple women and was causing them harm. She also shared photos and videos of Hwang and the women on Instagram.

In response to the controversy, Hwang Ui-jo countered that he had been receiving threats since May after his cell phone was stolen in Greece last November.===On the 20th, Hwang Ui-jo's legal representative, Law Firm Daehwan, issued a statement claiming that "(the video) was agreed upon between the lovers at the time," and that "Hwang Ui-jo does not currently possess the video, nor has he leaked it at all." It also said, "The case began as a victim of a leaked video.

"This case began with Hwang Ui-jo as the victim of the video leak," the law firm said, adding, "We feel deep regret and responsibility for Hwang Ui-jo's former lover who was harmed by this incident."

1. Hello, I am Eun Lee, a lawyer representing the victims of the alleged illegal filming of national soccer player Hwang Eui-jo.

2. On June 25, 2023, a user claiming to be Hwang Ui-jo's ex-lover circulated a number of photos on social media, claiming that Hwang Ui-jo was in a relationship with a number of women and causing damage. In response, Hwang Ui-jo stated that he had not done anything illegal and that his phone had been stolen and that he had been threatened for circulating the photos.

3. However, this was not the case. The victim had not consented to Hwang's filming in the first place, and if she knew about it, she had expressed her disapproval and demanded that it be deleted immediately after it was taken, so there was no reason for Hwang to arbitrarily think that she had consented to it. In addition, there were cases where she did not even know that the filming had taken place until she was investigated for this incident.

The victim's expressions of disapproval and requests for deletion were ignored, and the illegal filming was repeated. All she could do was continue to ask Hwang to delete the footage. The victim was angry and anxious, but she was also worried that Hwang would leak the illegal footage if he had it. The fear of leakage made it difficult for the victim to speak out against Hwang or report him. As is the case in most relationships, the victim tried to maintain an amicable relationship with Hwang without offending his feelings.

4. Immediately after the video was illegally distributed, Hwang immediately filed a complaint against the distributor, but the victim was unable to do so. After the video went viral, the victim was unable to sleep at night because she was afraid that the uploader, who claimed to be her ex-lover, might have been the victim of illegal filming, and she was furious that the uploader, who had a vendetta against her, could upload additional videos of her, claiming to be the victim of illegal filming. However, the victim was unable to do anything for fear that the video would be further distributed or that she would be identified as a victim. In the meantime, the victim's misery was indescribable as she watched Hwang Ui-jo make a statement saying that the video was taken consensually between her and her lover, and the video was reported in the media.

5. At the end of June, Hwang Ui-jo contacted the victim, and shortly thereafter, the victim asked him to sue the distributor in order to catch him quickly. The victim was embarrassed, but he could not help but think about the additional damage that could be caused if the distributor was not caught. After deep consideration, the victim filed a formal complaint with the police against the distributor for illegal distribution and against Hwang Ui-jo for illegal filming.

On November 16, 2023, the Seoul Central District Court held a trial for an arrest warrant against the distributor. The victim's lawyer attended the trial. From the victim's point of view, the situation was very embarrassing, especially the fact that the distributor was denying the crime, the fact that Hwang Ui-jo submitted a request for non-punishment against such a distributor, and the suspicion of additional crimes against Hwang Ui-jo through the statements made by the distributor in court during the detention hearing. I would like to tell a more detailed story here, but given that the distributor is currently detained but has not yet been indicted, I will limit myself to this. 카지노 

On November 20, 2023, Hwang Ui-jo was investigated for illegal filming, and reports followed, with Hwang's camp stating that the video was taken consensually between the couple and that he was not responsible for its dissemination. However, as I mentioned earlier, while it is true that the victim had briefly dated Hwang Ui-jo in the past, she did not agree to the filming of any other sensitive footage at that time or since, and has repeatedly requested that it be deleted. If Hwang had not illegally filmed the video in the first place, as the victim wished, and if he had deleted the video before it was distributed, the victim would not have been hurt by the illegal filming and her character would not have been tarnished twice or thrice by the distribution of the illegal video. However, instead of looking back and reflecting on his mistakes, Hwang lied to the media and said that the video was filmed by consent with his ex-lover, leaving irreparable scars and trauma in the victim's heart.

8. Until the victim came across the above report, she had not even expressed that she was a victim of illegal filming by Hwang Ui-jo. However, she came to the conclusion that she was a victim of illegal filming and had never agreed to the illegal filming, so there was no reason for her to bear this stigma, and she knew better than anyone else how anxious victims like her would feel if she remained silent because the video had not been circulated, so she could not condone Hwang Ui-jo's criminal behavior. Therefore, while we are still in an uneasy and difficult situation, we are now speaking out through our legal representatives out of a desire to right the wrongs and prevent further harm. We also hope that Mr. Hwang will realize his mistake and admit the facts now, as that would be the only way to apologize to the victims.